← All case studies

manc&dandy

2,669 messages delivered to founder-led creative agencies across the UK — configured in about 40 minutes, live two days later.

  • 2,669 messages delivered
  • 26,802 URLs analysed
  • ~40 min of setup
  • Same day reply from Rob to our own message

How we met them

There's a certain irony here: the best test of a prospecting tool is someone whose job is prospecting. Rob has spent 12 years finding clients for creative agencies. On 10 June 2026 at 3:36 am, our AI-written message landed in the contact form of his own website. At 10:10 the same morning, he replied:

“The system clearly works, but your well-written copy is what’s made it effective here.” — Rob Edison, manc&dandy — reply received 10/06/2026 at 10:10 am

The client

manc&dandy provides outsourced, fractional new business for creative agencies in the UK — Rob and his associate Mike sell precisely the service murmur automates: finding clients for agencies. Twelve years in this market.

  • Contact: Rob Edison
  • Country: United Kingdom
  • Trade: Fractional new business for creative agencies
  • Experience: 12 years
  • Agreement: UK exclusivity on the creative-agency segment

The problem

Small creative agencies are brilliant at telling other brands' stories — and never find time to sell their own. New business rests on the founder, so it only happens when the order book empties: the worst possible moment. manc&dandy sells the fix to that problem, and was facing it for its own pipeline.

What we built

Targeting drawn from our UK index — around 2 million companies, of which roughly 1 million were queryable at the time. During the discovery call, a live search on Wales alone surfaced about 380 agencies. The filter: creative agencies and professional services, under 100 staff, founder-led. An AI verification layer checks every target before sending and discards anything outside the profile.

The setup: about 40 minutes of configuration through the client link — details, targeting, message, personalisation — and the campaign went live two days later. Every reply lands directly in the client’s inbox; nothing passes through us. The complete list of contacted companies is delivered at the end of the run.

  • ~380 agencies surfaced in Wales during the live demo
  • <100 staff — founder-led filter
  • 2 days from configuration to launch

Messages actually sent

Excerpts from the campaign, anonymised — the facts are kept, the names are not. Validation test: if you can swap the prospect’s name for a direct competitor’s and the message still works, it is too generic.

N° 01 — Independent filmmaker — 16 years, national broadcast roster

It makes sense that an independent filmmaker with sixteen years' experience and a roster that spans the BBC, Channel 4 and Olympic Broadcasting would build a business that's built squarely around your craft.

A career résumé no competitor could borrow.

N° 02 — eCommerce agency — founder-led since 1999, South Wales

It's refreshing to see an agency that's been founder-led since 1999, keeping that independent spirit while turning out serious eCommerce work for clients like Cardiff's best-known bike retailer.

A named, located client reference pulled from the portfolio.

N° 03 — Drone filming operator, Sussex

Twenty-six years behind the lens, 17 shooting, over a decade as a drone operator — it's the kind of career that builds itself on craft, not on chasing new business.

Three career figures, read straight off the site.

N° 04 — Independent marketing agency, Portsmouth — founded 2006

I saw that the agency was founded in Portsmouth back in 2006, and you've kept the team deliberately lean since then. That independence is something a lot of agencies aspire to, but it means new business rests on very few shoulders.

Founder, city and year on the prospect's about page (name withheld here).

N° 05 — 3D visualisation studio, Nottingham — founded 2022

I noticed the studio is a deliberately independent operation founded in 2022, just a handful of people running a full-stack 3D visualisation and software shop from Nottingham.

Recent founding year and exact speciality — nothing generic survives the test.

The numbers

Campaign — UK creative agencies

  • Messages delivered: 2,669
  • Successful URLs: 2,642
  • URLs analysed: 26,802
  • Send windows: 10, 13 and 15 July 2026 (+11 residual sends until 3 August)
  • Personalised messages: 100% of sends

Why the channel isn’t saturated

  • No exploitable contact form: 3,067
  • Ghost or inactive sites: 1,560
  • No delivery confirmation: 1,070
  • Anti-spam filtering: 485
  • Screened out by the AI profile filter: 14,832
  • Other technical failures (network, timeouts, fields): 2,441
  • Delivered on 1st / 2nd / 3rd attempt: 1,059 / 675 / 445
  • Delivered beyond the 3rd attempt: 463

Over half of delivered messages required technical retries on reluctant sites — volume that a generic tool would simply have lost.

What came back

Replies landed directly in Rob’s inbox. A few, anonymised:

“Your appointment has been confirmed: July 15, 11:00 am BST, 45 minutes, Google Meet.” — A Welsh studio — booked a slot straight from the message, via the calendar link
“I’d be happy to take a 30 minute call but just a heads up; I’m quite sceptical re outsourced biz dev.” — A Manchester digital studio — scepticism included, call accepted
“I have just received your email to our hello@ address. I have half an hour next week for a chat.” — A creative agency, South Wales

No response rate published: the dashboard figure for this campaign was inflated by automated acknowledgements, and we told the client so in writing. Volumes and verifiable replies only.

The client’s verdict — unpolished

I’d definitely like to keep going as I can see real value. There are a couple of leads that I’m quite optimistic about!

What worked

  • Interesting leads came through, including a couple Rob rates as genuinely promising.
  • The sorted inbox on the client link: “definitely helpful” — and he would much rather see false positives than miss a reply.
  • Forty minutes of setup, live two days later, every reply in his own inbox.

What we fix next run

  • Leads skewed smaller than hoped — mostly one-man bands. Rob attributes it to the copy angle: next run tests other messages.
  • The follow-up message wasn’t distinctive enough; next run adds a secondary ask or offer to lift responses.
  • A forward-only reply address had no junk folder, and several replies landed there — caught only because they were also forwarded to us. Onboarding now flags this setup explicitly.

What's next

A new run on the remaining target with copy variants and a secondary offer in the follow-up — same setup, no reconfiguration.

Want the same kind of results?

Let's talk for 30 minutes, no commitment. Not sure which mode fits your need? We'll guide you.

Talk to the team See all case studies →